Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Nationalist bias in Turkish official discourse on hate speech: a Rawlsian criticism

Buy Article:

$53.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

This article analyzes the approach in Turkey on hate speech by evaluating legal regulations, decisions and public responses. We argue that the Turkish case cultivates neither a lenient, nor a restrictive response to hate speech, because a strong nationalist bias seems to be at work in interpreting, penalizing or allowing hate speech. The peculiarity of the Turkish case stems from a prejudice that hate speech might be conducted only against the nation, unity of the state, or the principles of regime, rather than against vulnerable groups or identities. By focusing on the Hrant Dink case among others we try to demonstrate the most striking example of this prejudice.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Hate speech; Hrant Dink; Turkish politics; freedom of speech; minorities; nationalism; political justice

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

Publication date: January 1, 2019

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more