The statement, by the eighteenth-century economist Adam Smith, that luxuries are all things that are not necessities is too simplistic an approach to be useful within the context of zooarchaeology. To start with, all animal products could be regarded as unnecessary within the human diet. Therefore, a four-part subdivision is proposed, distinguishing between foodstuffs that fulfil basic physiological needs, those that fulfil imagined needs, those that render a diet affluent and, finally, luxury foods. Optimal foraging theory further develops this subdivision by also taking into account the costs involved in obtaining the ingredients. The distinction between the affluent and the luxurious diet in particular allows us to define criteria through which luxury foods can be recognized within a zooarchaeological assemblage. At the same time, however, the constraints of such an exercise become apparent. This theoretical approach is illustrated by case studies from Roman to post-medieval Europe.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Instituut voor het Archeologisch Patrimonium van de Vlaamse/Gemeenschap (IAP), Doornveld 1, bus 30, B-1731 Zelik-Asse, Belgium
Royal Museum of Central Africa, 3080 Tervuren, Belgium
Seminar für Ur und Frühgeschichte, Abteilung Archäobiologie, Universität Basel, CH-401 Basel, Switzerland
February 3, 2003
More about this publication?