Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Sympathy and its discontents: 'Greatest happiness' versus the 'general good'

Buy Article:

$53.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

The paper explicates the utilitarian principle of sympathy in terms of the shape of what has been called the 'sympathetic gradient', which determines the allocation of goods to those close by and afar. It examines challenges to the utilitarian impartial weighting scheme that emerged in the literary community, and from evolutionary biology. As sympathy came to be seen as an impediment to evolutionary perfection, voices urged that sympathy be suppressed. Darwin's Descent of Man explicitly countenanced the suppression of sympathy in a trade-off of happiness for the perfection of the race. A post-Darwinian argument concerning a different capacity for pleasure accompanied the demise of sympathy in utilitarian economic analysis. Utilitarians then moved from the early presumption of 'everyone to count for one' to counting 'every equal increment of pleasure' equally.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Darwin; Edgeworth; eugenics; evolutionary biology; greatest happiness principle; sympathy

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Economics Department Baldwin-Wallace College Berea OH 44017 [email protected] David M. Levy 2: James Buchanan Center George Mason University Fairfax VA 22030  : [email protected]

Publication date: September 1, 2004

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more