The assessment of risk is a top priority within routine counselling and psychotherapy services. However, staff often receive little training in this area. Research suggests that differences between practitioner-rated and client self-report assessments are to be expected and has indicated that the rates of difference can be relatively high (i.e., >50%). However, no national benchmarks have yet been presented which allow both practitioners and services to assess their degree of difference between client- and therapist-ratings of risk. This study uses data drawn from the CORE National Research Database and the risk domain of the CORE-OM ( n =25338) to address this issue. Percentage of difference in assessment rates are presented to enable services to compare their rates of difference with those obtained in other services. The CORE-OM risk domain identified 44% of clients as ‘at risk' while the practitioner assessment identified 10% of clients as being ‘at risk'. For the overall sample, 18% of clients were classified by the practitioner as presenting no risk when the CORE-OM risk domain identified them at risk. There were large variations between services. The practical use and implications of the results presented are discussed by managers of NHS primary care counselling services.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Psychological Therapies Research Centre, University of Leeds
Psychology and Counselling Directorate, Counselling in Primary Care Services Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust
Publication date: March 1, 2006