Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Working memory capacity and the spacing effect in cued recall

Buy Article:

$54.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Spacing repetitions typically improves memory (the spacing effect). In three cued recall experiments, we explored the relationship between working memory capacity and the spacing effect. People with higher working memory capacity are more accurate on memory tasks that require retrieval relative to people with lower working memory capacity. The experiments used different retention intervals and lags between repetitions, but were otherwise similar. Working memory capacity and spacing of repetitions both improved memory in most of conditions, but they did not interact, suggesting additive effects. The results are consistent with the ACT-R model’s predictions, and with a study-phase recognition process underpinning the spacing effect in cued recall.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Spacing effect; cued recall; lag effect; working memory capacity

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA 2: Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

Publication date: July 3, 2018

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more