A range of institutional and financial instruments has been used to drive population health outcomes in primary health care in Australia. However, GP sovereignty and the corporatized nature of general practice have generated major challenges. The core of government reform strategy since
1992 has been the creation and financing of Primary HealthCare Organizations (PHCOs), in various forms, to provide an organizational basis to connect GPs to population health performance, and a closer link between the state and GPs. The shift from Divisions of General Practice, the first PHCO,
to Medicare Locals (MLs) in 2011 was notable. The latter constructed the object of performance as a raft of broader population health goals, which were framed in terms of accountability to communities through public reporting. Drawing on interviews with Federal government, health professional
associations, ML executives and GPs, this paper examines the ways in which such performance instruments were imagined and understood, and areas of contestation. The findings show the different rationalities at play and how different actors seek control of the policy space. They also demonstrate
the political precariousness of PHCOs, and the wider difficulty of steering market-based professionals in the achievement of population health objectives.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Primary Health Care Organization;
Document Type: Research Article
School of Human Services and Social Work, Griffith University, Logan, Australia
School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Publication date: November 1, 2016
More about this publication?