This paper investigated whether the nature of the language in wine reviews differs by wine ratings. Reviews of 1-, 3- and 5-star wines were downloaded into text files, then analyzed for Word Count, Analytic, Clout, Authentic and Tone by using LIWC text analysis. ANOVAS was adopted to
determine differences between reviews by ratings. There were significant differences between wines by star rating on Word Count, Analytic, and Tone, while there were no significant differences on Clout and Authenticity. This research was limited to South African wines, 1-, 3- and 5-star reviews.
It was not possible to identify all individual reviewers. Also, price and availability were not considered. Research implications include using other textual analysis software to conduct inter-reviewer comparison of reviews with the same ratings by different influential wine writers, investigating
price as a variable in rating and review, and authenticity as a factor in the context. Wine marketers can help wine makers gain a better understanding of what tastemakers prefer by analyzing wine reviews with automated text analysis software such as LIWC. A positive link between word count
in a wine review, the degree of analysis and tone used with the ratings of wines by experts can be established.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
automated text analysis;
Document Type: Research Article
Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University (SFU), Vancouver, Canada
Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, Johannesburg, South Africa
Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
October 2, 2019
More about this publication?