Setting universal goals for sustainability is problematic and may hinder the adoption of sustainable pathways as different sectors of society often have differing opinions on not just what sustainability means for them, but also what is of priority to them. This paper tests a set of
psychographic, behavioural, lifestyle and social identities to segment the public on sustainability. We evaluate general knowledge, apply social-choice tools to identify public priorities, and then apply segmentation to reveal broad strata of community profiles around these choices. We discuss
our findings in the context of moving beyond knowledge on sustainability and general public choices, to more nuanced messaging and engagement that respects differences in sustainability orientations. We suggest that by focusing on what matters most for different segments of society, there
is potential to design effective processes to engage with people and acquire better ownership of sustainability.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Adaptive Social and Economic Systems Programme, Land and Water Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Kenmore, Australia
School of Social Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
Publication date: March 3, 2016
More about this publication?