Skip to main content

Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?

Buy Article:

$63.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

We asked a national sample of 651 US residents about the feelings, emotions, images and colours they associated with nearby waste management, energy, industrial facilities and other big developments commonly regarded as locally unwanted land uses (LULUs). The respondents showed the expected dislike of them, picking ‘bad’, ‘fear’, ‘polluted’, red and black to describe them more than ‘safe’, ‘secure’, ‘jobs’ and other positive descriptors and images. Waste management facilities, especially nuclear ones, had the most negative labels, and coal and gas energy facilities had fewer than anticipated. This survey occurred prior to the events in the Fukushima plant in Japan. However, even before those events LULU concerns endured and nuclear facilities and chemical and metal plants were the most distressing to the public as a whole.

Keywords: LULUs; NIMBY; TOADS; affect heuristic

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston AvenueNew Brunswick,NJ,08901-1958, USA 2: Vanderbilt Institute for Energy and Environment, PMB 407702, 2301 Vanderbilt PlaceNashville,TN,37240, USA

Publication date: 01 July 2012

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content