Skip to main content

Open Access Contextual Duplicity and Textual Variation: The Siren and Onocentaur in the Physiologus Tradition

It is chiefly in the treatment of manuscript variation that approaches toward the editing of ancient and medieval texts diverge. On the one hand, there are methods of textual criticism that lead to the editorial fashioning of authoritative, standardized, or reconstructed texts. Such methods have at their heart certain presuppositions about why copyists and translators might have deviated from their exemplars, and each of these presuppositions is sound, if not always valid. On the basis of internal manuscript evidence, scribal inconsistency has been attributed to unintentional physical lapses (omission, dittography, haplology, orthographic confusion), or intentional alteration (correction, interpolation, deletion, tendentious manipulation), among other things. After an examination of external manuscript evidence, which yields information about the number and age of the witnesses, such editorial guidelines emerge as brevior lectio probabilior and difficilior lectio potior, and choices are made that result in a critically established text. On the other hand, there are proponents of "new" and materialist philology who regard textual variation as a defining feature of manuscript culture and thus endorse the synchronic evaluation of manuscripts as textual and cultural monuments of equal value. Products of such thinking, namely diplomatic editions (which have a long history), gain and lose popularity according to disciplinary trends. The aim of the present study is to propose a synthetic approach toward a particular type of textual instability that is both sensitive to local manuscript cultures and yet capable of surmising an archetypal stimulation for manuscript variation. The type of instability in mind might be called context-based variation, and an argument for its existence can be made most convincingly in light of evidence drawn from broadly disseminated textual traditions. The example presented below will concern the siren and onocentaur in the many versions of the Physiologus that were produced before the middle of the thirteenth century.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2010

More about this publication?
  • Until a short time ago, in German speaking countries there has neither been a periodical dealing primarly with interdisciplinary research of the Middle Ages, nor has there been a forum for regular publications in other languages. Wishing to close this gap, the journal «Mediaevistik» therefore pursues two aims: 1. To publish research methods and results which deal with studies within the different categories of the Middle Ages as a subject, and 2. to offer a forum for studies in all other important European languages and thus stressing and furthering the internationality of this particular field of research. The time frame is approx. the 8th to the 16th century, corresponding with the geographical boundaries of Latin Christianity in the High Middle Ages.

    All articles in Mediaevistik are published as full open access articles under a CC-BY Creative Commons license 4.0. There are no submission charges and no Article Processing Charges as these are fully funded by institutions through Knowledge Unlatched, resulting in no direct charge to authors.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content