Disease burden in patients with asthma before initiating biologics: A retrospective cohort database study
Background:
Real-world data on the characteristics and burden of disease among patients with asthma before receiving asthma-specific biologics would improve the understanding of the use of these therapies in a clinical setting. Currently, limited data are available on the use of mepolizumab and omalizumab for the treatment of asthma.
Objective:
To determine the characteristics and disease burden among patients with asthma before initiating treatment with mepolizumab or omalizumab.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage Plan members from a medical claims database with a new claim for mepolizumab or omalizumab between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017 (GSK ID: HO-17‐18283). Eligible patients had a diagnosis of asthma and continuous enrollment in the health plan, with clinical and pharmacy benefits for 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic treatment (baseline period), and no diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria during the baseline period. Patient characteristics, exacerbations, and asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs were assessed during the baseline period.
Results:
Overall, 188 and 901 patients prescribed mepolizumab and omalizumab, respectively, were included. In the 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic therapy, the patients prescribed mepolizumab were older, had higher blood eosinophil counts, more-frequent exacerbations (2.9 versus 2.0 exacerbations/year; p < 0.001), and more inhaled corticosteroid and systemic corticosteroid use compared with those prescribed omalizumab. Overall, asthma-related health-care resource utilization and costs were similar across both treatment cohorts, although patients prescribed mepolizumab had more pharmacy fills, higher pharmacy costs, and lower clinic costs compared with patients prescribed omalizumab (20.8 versus 16.9 fills, $4504 versus $3102, and $1816 versus $2709, respectively; all p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
In the 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic therapy, the patients prescribed mepolizumab may have a greater disease burden than those prescribed omalizumab. Overall, health-care resource utilization and costs were broadly similar across both treatment cohorts.
Real-world data on the characteristics and burden of disease among patients with asthma before receiving asthma-specific biologics would improve the understanding of the use of these therapies in a clinical setting. Currently, limited data are available on the use of mepolizumab and omalizumab for the treatment of asthma.
Objective:
To determine the characteristics and disease burden among patients with asthma before initiating treatment with mepolizumab or omalizumab.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage Plan members from a medical claims database with a new claim for mepolizumab or omalizumab between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017 (GSK ID: HO-17‐18283). Eligible patients had a diagnosis of asthma and continuous enrollment in the health plan, with clinical and pharmacy benefits for 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic treatment (baseline period), and no diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria during the baseline period. Patient characteristics, exacerbations, and asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs were assessed during the baseline period.
Results:
Overall, 188 and 901 patients prescribed mepolizumab and omalizumab, respectively, were included. In the 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic therapy, the patients prescribed mepolizumab were older, had higher blood eosinophil counts, more-frequent exacerbations (2.9 versus 2.0 exacerbations/year; p < 0.001), and more inhaled corticosteroid and systemic corticosteroid use compared with those prescribed omalizumab. Overall, asthma-related health-care resource utilization and costs were similar across both treatment cohorts, although patients prescribed mepolizumab had more pharmacy fills, higher pharmacy costs, and lower clinic costs compared with patients prescribed omalizumab (20.8 versus 16.9 fills, $4504 versus $3102, and $1816 versus $2709, respectively; all p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
In the 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic therapy, the patients prescribed mepolizumab may have a greater disease burden than those prescribed omalizumab. Overall, health-care resource utilization and costs were broadly similar across both treatment cohorts.
Keywords: Asthma; asthma-related costs; disease burden; exacerbation; health care resource utilization; mepolizumab; monoclonal antibody; omalizumab; real-world study
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: From Respiratory, U.S. Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), La Jolla, California 2: Respiratory, U.S. Medical Affairs, GSK Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 3: Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Publication date: May 1, 2019
This article was made available online on March 29, 2019 as a Fast Track article with title: "Disease burden in patients with asthma before initiating biologics: A retrospective cohort database study ".
- Allergy and Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists.
The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma and by having the potential to directly impact the quality of patient care. AAP welcomes the submission of original works including peer-reviewed original research and clinical trial results. Additionally, as the official journal of the Eastern Allergy Conference (EAC), AAP will publish content from EAC poster sessions as well as review articles derived from EAC lectures.
Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
Articles marked "F" offer free full text for personal noncommercial use only.
The journal is indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Science Citation Index Expanded, plus the National Library of Medicine's PubMed service. - Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprint Requests
- Commercial level: Permission to use content
- www.JFoodAllergy.com
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Receive new issue alert- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content