Mohs micrographic surgery is dependent upon accurate interpretation of frozen section slides to ensure complete tumor removal and high cure rates. The objective of this study was to determine an aggregate concordance of histologic frozen section interpretation between the Mohs surgeon
and dermatopathologists as available in the literature. The study sought to assess the bias risk, applicability, and level of evidentiary support for studies of histologic accuracy between these two provider groups. A systematic literature review of three medical databases was conducted. The
Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies instrument was used to determine bias risk and applicability. The level of evidence was then determined by using the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) model. According to the literature, the concordance rate for frozen slide interpretation
between fellowship-trained Mohs surgeons and dermatopathologists was 99.4% after reviewing 5,566 cases with CEBM Level 2 evidence. This study confirms a high level of correlation of histologic frozen section slide interpretation between fellowship-trained Mohs surgeons and dermatopathologists,
which is supported by Level 2 evidence with low bias risk and low applicability concerns.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
NON-MELANOMA SKIN CANCER;
Document Type: Research Article
October 1, 2019
More about this publication?
Technology and Innovation, edited and published by the National Academy of Inventors, is a forum for presenting information encompassing the entire field of applied sciences, with a focus on transformative technology and academic innovation. Regular features of T&I include commentaries contributed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and in-depth profiles of Fellows of the National Academy of Inventors in every issue.