Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

The frequency of corporate misconduct: public enforcement versus private reality

Buy Article:

$41.61 + tax (Refund Policy)

Purpose

Perceptions about the frequency of misconduct – among the public, academics and even regulators – have largely been formed by examining enforcement statistics, which rely on the detection and sanctioning of the misconduct. This study aims to illuminate the real occurrence of corporate misconduct, much of which escapes public detection.

Design/methodology/approach

By examining confidential firm records describing misconduct within organizations, the author shows that public enforcement statistics significantly underestimate the amount of serious malfeasance that arises within firms.

Findings

Through analyzing records for several large multinational firms, the author finds that there are, on average, more than two instances of internally substantiated misconduct per week per firm.

Originality/value

Ultimately, this analysis illustrates the challenge of addressing corporate malfeasance within large organizations.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Bribery; Fraud

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Business Administration, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Publication date: October 7, 2019

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more