Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of malignant colorectal polyps

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Background:

Treatment of patients with malignant large bowel polyps is highly dependent on pathological evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of endoscopically removed polyps.

Methods:

The records of 88 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent endoscopic removal of malignant polyps were reviewed. Study investigators reviewed the initial pathology report; three experienced gastrointestinal pathologists reviewed all slides in a blinded fashion. Interobserver variability of pathological assessment of malignant polyps was analysed by κ statistics.

Results:

Seventy‐six (86 per cent) of the 88 patients had malignant polyps and 12 (14 per cent) had carcinoma in situ. Agreement between experienced pathologists was substantial with regard to T stage (κ = 0·725), resection margin status (κ = 0·668) and Haggitt's classification (κ = 0·682), but comparison of initial and experienced pathologists' assessment demonstrated only moderate agreement in these areas (κ = 0·516, κ = 0·555 and κ = 0·578 respectively). Agreement between even experienced pathologists was poor with respect to histological grade of differentiated adenocarcinomas (κ = 0·163) and angiolymphatic vessel invasion (κ = − 0·017).

Conclusion:

Pathological assessment of malignant polyps varies between observers. Specialist pathologists appear to have a higher degree of consensus among themselves than with generalist pathologists with respect to T stage. The high interobserver variability with regard to histological grade of differentiated tumours is clinically irrelevant. However, variability in the assessment of angiolymphatic vessel invasion limits the value of this measurement for clinical decision making. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan 2: Department of Pathology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA 3: Department of Pathology, Fairview-University Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA 4: Department of Pathology, Fairview Southdale Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA 5: Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA 6: Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Publication date: November 1, 2004

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more