Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Cognate and locative complements

Their effect on (a)telicity and their semantic relation to the verb

Buy Article:

$30.19 + tax (Refund Policy)

In this article we investigate Halliday's proposal to collapse cognate and locative complements into one semantic role, the Range, which he divides into a quality and quantity subtype. As empirical data we use sets of examples with cognate and locative complements extracted from the COBUILD corpus. The examples have been analysed and quantified in terms of the determiner and modifier types of the complements, which will be shown to be central to the research questions. In the first section we argue that Halliday's semantic quality-quantity distinction should be replaced by the pragmatic-semantic distinction telic-atelic. In the second section we show that cognate and locative complements have a very different semantic relation to the verb, which does not warrant the claim that they fulfil the same semantic role.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: December 1, 2008

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more