Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

On calculating the reliability of the comparative method at long and medium distances: Afroasiatic comparative lexica as a test case

Buy Article:

$29.16 + tax (Refund Policy)

The high degree of contradiction and incompatibility between two independently produced Afroasiatic comparative lexica (Ehret 1995, Orel & Stolbova 1995) calls into question the reliability of the comparative method at deep time depths. The discrepancy could only have arisen if one or both sources contain a large number of chance or spurious matches. This article first documents the discrepancy between the two comparative lexica, and then attempts to explain it. The central proposal is that the evaluation of a proposed reconstruction must go beyond qualitative evaluations of individual proposed cognate sets and incorporate quantitative tools for evaluating the probable degree of chance matches within the reconstruction as a whole.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Afroasiatic; comparative method; lexical reconstruction; phonological reconstruction; probabilistic evaluation; probability theory in historical linguistics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2012

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more