Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content Summarising published results from spirometric surveys of COPD: the problem of inconsistent definitions

Download Article:
 Download
(PDF 259.5 kb)
 
SETTING: The use of different spirometric definitions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has made an informative review of the available prevalence surveys impossible.

OBJECTIVE: To derive adjustment factors that allow the comparison of studies using different spirometric criteria.

METHODS: Pre- and post-bronchodilator one-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) values were taken from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) survey in 16 centres. Using a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio less than the lower limit of normal (LLN) as our reference prevalence, we calculated simple multiplicative adjustments to transform other reported prevalence estimates to reference values. These adjustments were then tested on independent data sets from six further BOLD centres and five centres from the PLATINO study, a Latin American survey on obstructive lung disease.

RESULTS: Prevalence estimates based on pre-bronchodilator fixed-ratio measurements were 5–25% higher than reference values, and were strongly positively biased with age and prevalence level. Applying simple adjustments provided prevalence estimates that were almost unbiased and within 5% of the reference values.

CONCLUSIONS: Using the BOLD data, we have been able to estimate COPD prevalences based on post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < LLN by adjusting estimates based on other common definitions, enabling more meaningful comparisons of published findings.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: global; methods; prevalence; spirometry

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK 2: Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico 3: Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 4: Kaiser-Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA 5: Post-Graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Publication date: August 1, 2014

More about this publication?
  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease publishes articles on all aspects of lung health, including public health-related issues such as training programmes, cost-benefit analysis, legislation, epidemiology, intervention studies and health systems research. The IJTLD is dedicated to the continuing education of physicians and health personnel and the dissemination of information on tuberculosis and lung health world-wide.

    Certain IJTLD articles are selected for translation into French, Spanish, Chinese or Russian. They are available on the Union website

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • Public Health Action
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more