Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

White-Point Preservation Enforces Positivity

Buy Article:

$17.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

It is commonplace to use a 3 × 3 linear transform to map device RGBs to XYZs. Two particular types of transforms have been developed based on the assumptions that we either maximally ignorant or maximally prescient about the world. Under the maximum ignorance assumption, it is assumed that nothing is known about the spectral statistics of the world and so the best correction transform is the one that maps device spectral sensitivities so they are as close to observer sensitivities as possible. Under maximum prescience, we know the spectral statistics that we will observe and so the maximally prescient transform maps, with minimumerror, the RGBs (that we knowwe will see) onto corresponding XYZs. In general the two assumptions lead to quite different color corrections.

In previous work we have argued against total ignorance or prescience and have instead developed compromise transforms. Our work is based on two observations. First, one is never completely ignorant about the world—color signal spectral power distributions are everywhere all positive. Second, it is accepted that it is much more important to correct some colors than other. In particular, white is central to color vision and color imaging, so it is imperative that white should always look right.

However, to date these two compromise solutions have been studied in isolation. Surely, it would be advantageous to combine the constraints of whiteness and positivity? In fact we show that this is not the case: by preserving white we enforce positivity. This is an important result. Not only does it add to our understanding of color correction, but it helps explain color correction results published in the literature (the assumptions of positivity and white-preservation lead to very similar results). Moreover, it helps us to derive a new measure for assessing the goodness (color correctability) of camera sensors that is strictly less pessimistic (and more accurate) than the existing Vora Value.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 1998

More about this publication?
  • CIC is the premier annual technical gathering for scientists, technologists, and engineers working in the areas of color science and systems, and their application to color imaging. Participants represent disciplines ranging from psychophysics, optical physics, image processing, color science to graphic arts, systems engineering, and hardware and software development. While a broad mix of professional interests is the hallmark of these conferences, the focus is color. CICs traditionally offer two days of short courses followed by three days of technical sessions that include three keynotes, an evening lecture, a vibrant interactive (poster) papers session, and workshops. An endearing symbol of the meeting is the Cactus Award, given each year to the author(s) of the best interactive paper; there are also Best Paper and Best Student Paper awards.

    Please note: for Purposes of its Digital Library content, IS&T defines Open Access as papers that will be downloadable in their entirety for free in perpetuity. Copyright restrictions on papers vary; see individual paper for details.

  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more