Visibilities of Exchange Across Forms: A Case Study of The House Of Mirth
This comparative reading of Edith Wharton’s The House of Mirth (1905) and Terence Davies’ film adaptation (2000) examines how different media make visible inequities of exchange and belie ideals of collectivity and democracy.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: University of Alberta
Publication date: June 1, 2017
More about this publication?
- PUBLIC is a beautifully designed peer-reviewed journal founded in Toronto as an intellectual and creative forum that focuses on how theoretical, and critical issues intersect with art and visual culture. Each issue's editors explore a contemporary theme by bringing together a unique assemblage of Canadian and international art projects with writing by scholars, curators, critics, and artists. This, along with book and exhibit reviews, creates an assemblage of artists projects and original writing on prescient contemporary themes in art and culture.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Intellect Books page
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites