Born under a bad sign: On the dark rhetoric of antinatalism | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

Abstract

Offering a pointed response to the perennial question of being, those sympathetic to the philosophical posture of antinatalism proclaim the suffering of the world does not ultimately justify bringing life into it, consequently advancing a moral stance towards procreation. As this particular topic of conversation is unlikely to curry favor with a majority of interlocutors, the antinatalist-as-rhetor faces a seemingly Sisyphean task in issuing a harsh alternative to the more pervasive narrative espousing birth as an occasion for celebration. Cautious to dismiss antinatalism as simply a profane social discourse, I first consider its communicative import as type of tragic rhetoric which identifies birth as a phenomenological disaster that warrants more critical appraisal. Additionally, I examine the utility of embracing a performative writing style to explore this topic insofar as it adds rhetorical dimension to the attempt at communicating the horrors of existence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc.9.1.41_1
2018-05-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc.9.1.41_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): antinatalism; performative writing; pessimism; philosophy; rhetoric; tragedy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error