Testing open-source visualization tools with small- and medium-sized enterprises ecosystem data: Towards the understanding of innovation ecosystem design | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Design, Business & Society
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

This article explores open-source visualization tools to enhance the understanding of small- and medium-enterprise (SME) ecosystem structures. Ecosystem approaches are becoming important in business strategy and innovation where organizations are heavily relying on inter-firm resources to innovate. Consequently, the traditional firm-focused business models face challenges, making it difficult for interconnected and diverse actors to co-create across firm boundaries. This challenge is even worse for manufacturing SMEs, who often lack the tools to make sense of their innovation ecosystem structures. We carried out a rich ethnographic investigation in three cases in the United Kingdom: the ceramic artist ecosystem, the 3D printing bureau ecosystem and the FabLab ecosystem. From the initial thematic analysis results, all actors highlighted the difficulty in understanding ecosystem networks. The following ecosystem attributes were identified as essential in understanding SME ecosystem structures: clusters and bridges, tie size, structural holes, role structure and interactivity. In this article, fourteen open-source visualization tools are tested to compare how well different tools reveal the six ecosystem attributes. Our findings demonstrate that open-source visualization tools have different affordances, most of which are useful in revealing ecosystem attributes. Results show that most visualization tools help aid the understanding of SME ecosystem structures. This study contributes new knowledge on the scarce subject of designing and managing ecosystems, presenting a unique approach to explore and understand ecosystem configurations. The study identifies limitations in open-source visualization tools and offers the design management community a set of recommendations for further development of visualization tools to support decision-making.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00026_1
2020-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adner, R.. ( 2017;), ‘ Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. ’, Journal of Management, 43:1, pp. 39–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adner, R., and Feiler, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Interdependence, perception, and investment choices: An experimental approach to decision making in innovation ecosystems. ’, Organization Science, 30:1, p. 109.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahuja, G.. ( 2000;), ‘ Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. ’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45:3, pp. 425–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Basole, R. C.,, Clear, T.,, Mengdie, H.,, Mehrotra, H., and Stasko, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Understanding interfirm relationships in business ecosystems with interactive visualization. ’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19:12, pp. 2526–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Basole, R.,, Srinivasan, A.,, Park, H., and Patel, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Ecoxight: Discovery, exploration, and analysis of business ecosystems using interactive visualization. ’, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 9:2, pp. 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Börner, K.,, Maltese, A.,, Balliet, R. N., and Heimlich, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Investigating aspects of data visualization literacy using 20 information visualizations and 273 science museum visitors. ’, Information Visualization, 15:3, pp. 198–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bounegru, L.,, Venturini, T.,, Gray, J., and Jacomy, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Narrating networks: Exploring the affordances of networks as storytelling devices in journalism. ’, Digital Journalism, 5:6, pp. 699–730.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradley, S.. ( 2013), Design Fundamentals: Elements, Attributes, and Principles, Boulder, CO:: Vanseo Design;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Callon, M., and Latour, B.. ( 1981;), ‘ Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. ’, in K. D. Knorr-Cetina, and A. V. Cicourel. (eds), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, Boston, MA:: Routledge and Kegan Paul;, pp. 277–303.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cuba, N.. ( 2015;), ‘ Research note: Sankey diagrams for visualizing land cover dynamics. ’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, pp. 163–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dedehayir, O.,, Mäkinen, S., and Ortt, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. ’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, p. 18.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Giustiniano, L., and D’Alise, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Triple helix and innovation in the life-science industry. ’, GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR), 3:1, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Granovetter, M. S.. ( 1973;), ‘ The strength of weak ties. ’, American Journal of Sociology, 78:6, pp. 1360–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Granstrand, O., and Holgersson, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. ’, Technovation, 90&91, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Iansiti, M., and Levien, R.. ( 2004), The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business School Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacobides, M. G.,, Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Towards a theory of ecosystems. ’, Strategic Management Journal, 39:8, pp. 2255–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacomy, M.,, Venturini, T.,, Heymann, S., and Bastian, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Forceatlas2: A continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. ’, PLoS ONE, 9:6, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kello, C. T.. ( 1996;), ‘ Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka (eds), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices (Book Review). ’, American Journal of Psychology, 109:4, p. 630.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirk, A.. ( 2012), Data Visualization, Olton:: Packt Publishing Limited;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirk, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Data visualisation: A handbook for data-driven design. ’, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45:2, pp. 390–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Konietzko, J.,, Bocken, N., and Hultink, E. J.. ( 2020;), ‘ A tool to analyze, ideate and develop circular innovation ecosystems. ’, Sustainability, 12:1, p. 417.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Krzywinski, M.,, Birol, I.,, Jones, S. J. M., and Marra, M. A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Hive plots: Rational approach to visualizing networks. ’, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 13:5, pp. 627–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lamine, W.,, Fayolle, A.,, Jack, S., and Byrne, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ The role of materially heterogeneous entities in the entrepreneurial network. ’, Industrial Marketing Management, 80, pp. 99–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, J.,, Webster, D.,, Cai, J., and Muller, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Innovation clusters revisited: On dimensions of agglomeration, institution, and built-environment. ’, Sustainability, 11:12, p. 3338.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, N.,, Yang-Chih, F., and Ray-May, H.. ( 2001), The Position Generator: Measurement Techniques for Investigations of Social Capital. Social Capital: Theory and Research, New York:: Aldine de Gruyter;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lupton, R. C., and Allwood, J. M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. ’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 124, pp. 141–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lurie, N., and Mason, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ Visual representation: Implications for decision making. ’, Journal of Marketing, 71:1, pp. 160–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lüthje, C., and Herstatt, C.. ( 2004;), ‘ The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. ’, RandD Management, 34:5, pp. 553–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyman, M.,, Ref, R., and Wright, O.. ( 2018;), ‘ Ecosystems: Cornerstone of future growth. ’, Accenture, 11 May, https://Accenture-Strategy-Ecosystems-Exec-Summary-May2018-POV.pdf/. Accessed 30 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Manzini, E.. ( 2015), Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Maurits, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ Visual exploration of dynamic multichannel EEG coherence networks. ’, Computer Graphics Forum, 38:1, pp. 507–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Mei, H.,, Chen, W.,, Ma, Y.,, Guan, H., and Hu, W.. ( 2018;), ‘ Viscomposer: A visual programmable composition environment for information visualization. ’, Visual Informatics, 2:1, pp. 71–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Moore, J. F.. ( 1993;), ‘ Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. ’, Harvard Business Review, 71:3, p. 75.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mortati, M.,, Jack, S., and Cruickshank, L.. ( 2012;), ‘ Nets: A design tool for activating social networks. ’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 18:4, pp. 509–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nambisan, S.,, Lyytinen, K.,, Majchrzak, A., and Song, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. ’, MIS Quarterly, 41:1, p. 223.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Noh, H., and Lee, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Perceptual factors affecting the tendency to collaboration in SMEs: Perceived importance of collaboration modes and partners. ’, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10:3, pp. 18–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nthubu, B.. ( 2020;), ‘ Innovation ecosystem design datasets. ’, Figshare, 24 September, https://Doi.Org/10.6084/M9.Figshare.12861131.V2. Accessed 24 September 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Papanek, V. J.. ( 1972), Design for the Real World; Human Ecology and Social Change, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Park, H.,, Bellamy, M. A., and Basole, R. C.. ( 2016;), ‘ Visual analytics for supply network management: System design and evaluation. ’, Decision Support Systems, 91, pp. 89–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Phillips, R.,, Abbas-Nazari, A.,, Tooze, J., and Gant, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Designing for active engagement, enabling resilience and fostering environmental change. ’, Journal of Design, Business and Society, 6:1, pp. 43–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Platzer, A.,, Polzin, J.,, Rembart, K.,, Han, P. P.,, Rauer, D., and Nussbaumer, T.. ( 2018;), ‘ Biosankey: Visualisation of microbial communities over time. ’, Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics, 15:4, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Reed, C., and Lister, N. -M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Ecology and design: Parallel genealogies. ’, Places Journal, April, https://doi.org/10.22269/140414. Accessed 24 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rong, K.,, Patton, D., and Chen, W.. ( 2018;), ‘ Business models dynamics and business ecosystems in the emerging 3D printing industry. ’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, pp. 234–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. De Silva, M.,, Howells, J., and Meyer, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. ’, Research Policy, 47:1, pp. 70–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Simonsen, J., and Robertson, T.. ( 2013), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith, C. M.,, Allen, D. J.,, Nawaz, S.,, Kozlakidis, Z.,, Nastouli, E.,, Hayward, A., and Ward, K. N.. ( 2019;), ‘ An interactive data visualisation application to investigate nosocomial transmission of infections. ’, Wellcome Open Research, 4, p. 100.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Songling, Y.,, Ishtiaq, M.,, Anwar, M., and Ahmed, H.. ( 2018;), ‘ The role of government support in sustainable competitive position and firm performance. ’, Sustainability, 10:10, p. 3495.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Su, Y.-S.,, Zheng, Z.-X., and Chen, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ A multi-platform collaboration innovation ecosystem: The case of China. ’, Management Decision, 56:1, pp. 125–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Talmar, M.,, Walrave, B.,, Podoynitsyna, K. S.,, Holmström, J., and Romme, A. G. L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The ecosystem pie model. ’, Long Range Planning, 53:4, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Von Hippel, E.. ( 1986;), ‘ Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. ’, Management Science, 32:7, pp. 791–805.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Yin, R. K.. ( 2012), Applications of Case Study Research, Los Angeles, CA and London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhou, G., and Xia, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ OmicsNet: A web-based tool for creation and visual analysis of biological networks in 3D space. ’, Nucleic Acids Research, 46:W1, pp. W514–W22.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhou, G., and Xia, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Using OmicsNet for network integration and 3D visualization. ’, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 65:1, p. e69.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou, Z.,, Ye, Z.,, Yu, J., and Chen, W.. ( 2018;), ‘ Cluster-aware arrangement of the parallel coordinate plots. ’, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 46, pp. 43–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Zulu-Chisanga, S.,, Chabala, M., and Mandawa-Bray, B.. ( 2020;), ‘ The differential effects of government support, inter-firm collaboration and firm resources on SME performance in a developing economy. ’, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13:2, pp. 175–195.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Nthubu, Badziili,, Richards, Daniel, and Cruickshank, Leon. ( 2020;), ‘ Testing open-source visualization tools with small- and medium-sized enterprises ecosystem data: Towards the understanding of innovation ecosystem design. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 7:2, pp. 165–87, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00026_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00026_1
Loading
Testing open-source visualization tools with small- and medium-sized enterprises ecosystem data: Towards the understanding of innovation ecosystem design
Journal of Design, Business & Society 7, 165 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00026_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00026_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00026_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): decision-making; ecosystem attributes; innovation ecosystems; sense-making; visual analysis; visualization tools

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error