Response Organization of Mental Imagery, Evaluation of Descriptive Experience Sampling, and Alternatives A Commentary on Hurlburt's and Schwitzgebel's 'Describing Inner Experience?'
This commentary explores a number of issues raised by Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel (2007) in 'Describing Inner Experience'. The commentary argues for expanding the definition of mental imag-ery, by which it is a virtually universal human attribute; reintroduces a theory of response organization, the meaning complex, to conceptu-alize unsymbolized thinking; draws on work with Guided Affective Imagery to comment on the fragility versus robustness of mental imagery; comments on the virtues and probable flaws of Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES), including an evolutionary explanation of the flaws; and describes a pair of alternatives to DES: idiothetic experience sampling in which rating scales immediately follow the narrative reports, in place of delayed interviews, and the growing promise of coupling experience sampling with brain imaging.
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Division of Social Sciences, University of Minnesota, Morris; Morris, MN 56267, Email: [email protected]
Publication date: January 1, 2011