Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Change blindness blindness: as visual metacognition

Buy Article:

$21.82 + tax (Refund Policy)

Many experiments have demonstrated that people fail to detect seemingly large visual changes in their environment. Despite these failures, most people confidently predict that they would see changes that are actually almost impossible to see. Therefore, in at least some situations visual experience is demonstrably not what people think it is. This paper describes a line of research suggesting that overconfidence about change detection reflects a deeper metacognitive error (which we refer to as 'change blindness blindness', or CBB) founded on beliefs about attention and the role of meaning as a support for a coherent perceptual experience. Accordingly, CBB does not occur in all situations (subjects can, indeed, make accurate predictions about change detection in some circumstances), while the scope of the phenomenon remains broad enough to suggest more than a misunderstanding of a small niche of visual experience. I finish by arguing that despite the very small amount of research on visual metacognition, these beliefs are critical to understand.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Dept of Psychology, PO Box 5190, Kent State University, Kent OH 44242-0001. Email: [email protected]

Publication date: May 1, 2002

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more