Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Commentary on Chris Nunn's ‘Archetypes and memes’

Buy Article:

$22.64 + tax (Refund Policy)

The concept of archetypes has received a number of fundamentally different interpretations, and there are numerous additional philosophical concepts which can be characterized as modifications of those interpretations. Chris Nunn’s paper (Nunn, 1998) represents an approach to bringing a specific one among those concepts -- Richard Dawkins’ neo-Darwinistic conception of memes (Dawkins, 1976) -- into contact with the notion of archetypes as it has been mainly popularized by Carl Gustav Jung. Nunn states rightly that Jung’s own understanding of and emphasis on archetypes changed considerably during his lifetime. Therefore the difficulty is not only how to relate memes to archetypes, but also to distinguish that concept of archetypes to which memes relate from those to which they do not.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Review Article

Affiliations: Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestriche Physik, D-85740 Garching, Germany.

Publication date: March 1, 1998

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more