Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Phylogenetic relationships and morphological diversity in Neotropical Heliotropium (Heliotropiaceae)

Buy Article:

$14.25 + tax (Refund Policy)

Little is known about vegetative morphological diversification in Neotropical plant clades in comparison with diversification of reproductive characters. Phylogenetic relationships of the Neotropical Heliotropium (Heliotropiaceae) were studied using sequences of nrITS and four plastid regions (trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG, trnH-psbA, rps16). Vegetative morphological diversity (leaf morphology, habit), measured as amount of morphospace occupied and as variance of individual characters, was compared among the clades resolved and between groups of species inhabiting dry and humid areas. Three well-supported clades were recovered: (1) Heliotropium sect. Heliothamnus from the tropical Andes; (2) Heliotropium sect. Cochranea from the Peruvian and the Atacama Deserts; and (3) the Tournefortia clade, comprising the remaining American sections of Heliotropium and the mainly Neotropical Tournefortia sect. Tournefortia. Phylogenetic discordance detected between the plastid and nuclear partitions may have been due to lineage sorting, hybridization or differences in number of informative sites. Morphological diversity was largest in the Tournefortia clade and tended to be greater in dry than in humid areas, but without statistical sup port. Heliotropium sect. Cochranea was as diverse as the Tournefortia clade in leaf morphology and may have experienced adaptive radiation in the Atacama Desert. Lowest vegetative diversity was found in Heliotropium sect. Heliothamnus. The infrageneric delimitation in Heliotropium needs reassessment.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.

1 item.

No Article Media
No Metrics


Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie – Botanik, Altensteinstraße 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany, Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 9206, Santiago, Chile;, Email: [email protected] 2: Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie – Botanik, Altensteinstraße 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany 3: Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, MRC-166, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.

Publication date: 01 June 2011

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more