Skip to main content

Weightings of decision-making criteria for neighbourhood renewal: Perspectives of university students in Hong Kong

Notice

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Urban decay has long been of great concern to society in Hong Kong. Different approaches have been promoted by public agents to curb the problem, including building rehabilitation and redevelopment. Difficulties are often encountered, however, in balancing the diverse interests of stakeholders in deciding on the way forward for a project. While multicriteria decision-making models can be employed to facilitate the evaluation of available options, whether the process is sensitive to the project characteristics, such as scale and locality, has not been addressed. Through a structured questionnaire survey with 124 university students, it was found that that, from the perspective of young people, the rankings of decision criteria in terms of relative importance were very similar in Sai Yee Street and Kwun Tong Town Centre Projects. Yet the magnitudes of perceived weightings for most criteria varied significantly across the projects. These findings imply that projects with different characteristics should warrant different sets of criteria weightings to fit the specific constraints and circumstances in the projects. Practical implications for public administrators in formulating neighbourhood renewal strategy are described.

Keywords: Hong Kong; Neighbourhood renewal; multicriteria decision making; redevelopment; rehabilitation

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 January 2009

More about this publication?
  • Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal is the essential peer-reviewed journal for all professionals concerned with physical, economic and social regeneration of urban communities. It publishes in-depth articles and real world case studies on the latest strategy, policy making and current and best practice in the field. Guided by its expert Editor and Editorial Board, each quarterly 100-page issue does not publish advertising but rather in-depth articles written by and for urban regeneration professionals analysing current and best practice in the planning, consultation, funding, delivery and long-term management of regeneration programmes, as well as the latest policy making, developments and research in the field.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Contact us
  • Forthcoming content
  • Multi-user licences
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
UA-1313315-29