Skip to main content

Open Access The accuracy of newly proposed warning signs in the third edition of Malaysian guideline on the management of dengue infection in adult

Download Article:

The full text article is available externally.

The article you have requested is supplied via the DOAJ. View from original source.

This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of persistent vomiting and persistent diarrhoea proposed in the Malaysian dengue guideline. Methods: The eligibility criteria were dengue patients with vomiting or/and diarrhoea at the earliest day of illness without other warning signs. Vomiting and diarrhoea categorised by three or more episodes over 24 h were considered as warning signs. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: There were a total of 479 patients, of whom 36 (7.5%) got severe dengue and 443 (92.5%) got dengue with warning signs. The overall accuracy ranged from 33.3% to 72.7% for sensitivity, 28.8% to 56.5% for specificity, 1.8% to 14.5% for positive predictive value and 88.5% to 96.3% for negative predictive value. There were 16 false negative. Conclusions: The newly proposed warning signs in the third edition of Malaysian dengue guideline may not be effective in predicting severe dengue.

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Population Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Sungai Long, Bandar Sungai Long, Cheras 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia

Publication date: 01 January 2016

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content