Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content Universal voluntary HIV testing in antenatal care settings: a review of the contribution of provider‐initiated testing & counselling

Download Article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingenta Connect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library


Objective  To assess the contribution of provider‐initiated testing and counselling (PITC) to achieving universal testing of pregnant women and, from available data on components of PITC, assess whether PITC adoption adheres to pre‐test information, post‐test counselling procedures and linkage to treatment.

Methods  Systematic review of published literature. Findings were collated and data extracted on HIV testing uptake before and after the adoption of a PITC model. Data on pre‐ and post‐test counselling uptake and linkage to anti‐retrovirals, where available, were also extracted.

Results  Ten eligible studies were identified. Pre‐intervention testing uptake ranged from 5.5% to 78.7%. Following PITC introduction, testing uptake increased by a range of 9.9% to 65.6%, with testing uptake ≥85% in eight studies. Where reported, pre‐test information was provided to between 91.5% and 100% and post‐test counselling to between 82% and 99.8% of pregnant women. Linkage to ARVs for prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) was reported in five studies and ranged from 53.7% to 77.2%. Where reported, PITC was considered acceptable by ANC attendees.

Conclusion  Our review provides evidence that the adoption of PITC within ANC can facilitate progress towards universal voluntary testing of pregnant women. This is necessary to increase the coverage of PMTCT services and facilitate access to treatment and prevention interventions. We found some evidence that PITC adoption does not undermine processes inherent to good conduct of testing, with high levels of pre‐test information and post‐test counselling, and two studies suggesting that PITC is acceptable to ANC attendees.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Language: English

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1:  Faculty of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK 2:  World Health Organization, HIV Department, Geneva, Switzerland 3:  USAID, Office of HIV/AIDS, Washington, DC, USA 4:  Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA 5:  Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Publication date: January 1, 2012

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more