Health workers’ perceptions of obstetric critical incident audit in Thyolo District, Malawi
Objective To assess perceptions held by health workers in a Malawian district about obstetric critical incident audit. Insight into factors contributing to participation and endorsement may help to improve the audit process and reduce facility‐based maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity.
Methods This study involves semi‐structured interviews with 25 district health workers, a focus group discussion and observation of audit sessions in health facilities in Thyolo District, Malawi, between August 2009 and January 2010. Data were analysed with
Results Findings were categorized into four major areas: (i) general knowledge of audit, (ii) participation in local audit and feedback sessions, (iii) the ability to reproduce the local audit cycle and (iv) effects and outcomes of audit and feedback. All health workers were familiar with the concept of audit and could reproduce the local cycle. Most health workers classified audit as an instructive and helpful tool to improve the quality of their work, provided that it is performed in a manner that enhances motivation and on‐the‐job learning.
Conclusions Contradictory to recent reports from other African settings, which showed negative effects of audit on health workers’ motivation, staff in this district considered audit and feedback valuable tools to enhance the quality of the care they provide. Audit has become part of the professional routine in the district, and its educational value was considered its most important appeal.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Department of Medical Humanities, EMGO+ Institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2: Thyolo District Health Office, Ministry of Health, Thyolo, Malawi
Publication date: October 1, 2011