Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

LOW-DOSE LIDOCAINE REDUCES SECONDARY HYPERALGESIA BY A CENTRAL MODE OF ACTION

Buy Article:

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

Sodium channel blockers are approved for intravenous administration in the treatment of neuropathic pain states. Preclinical studies have suggested antihyperalgesic effects on the peripheral as well as the central nervous system. The objective of this study was to determine mechanisms of action of low-dose Lidocaine in experimental induced, secondary hyperalgesia. In a first experimental trial, participants (n = 12) received lidocaine systemically (a bolus injection of 2 mg/kg in 10 min followed by an intravenous infusion of 2 mg kg(−1) h(−1) for another 50 min). In a second trial, a modified intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) was administered to exclude possible central analgesic effects. In one arm, patients received an infusion of 40 mi lidocaine, 0.05%; in the other arm 40 mi NaCl, 0.9%, served as a control. In both trials capsaicin, 20 mu g, was injected intradermally and time course of capsaicin-induced pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia as well as axon reflex flare was determined. The capsaicin-induced pain was slightly reduced after systemic and regional application of the anesthetic. The area of pin-prick hyperalgesia was significantly reduced by systemic lidocaine, whereas the inhibition of hyperalgesia was absent during regional administration of lidocaine. In contrast, capsaicin-induced flare was significantly decreased after both treatments. We conclude that systemic lidocaine reduces pin-prick hyperalgesia by a central mode of action, which could involve blockade of terminal branches of nociceptors. A possible role for tetrodotoxin resistant sodium channels in the antihyperalgesic effect of low-dose lidocaine is discussed.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Abstract

Affiliations: Pain 85: 217–224, 2000. Reprinted with permission from the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Publication date: December 1, 2000

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more