Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for a continuous trait subject to culling before testing

Buy Article:

$59.00 + tax (Refund Policy)


The consequences of assuming a zero environmental covariance between a binary trait ‘test‐status’ and a continuous trait on the estimates of genetic parameters by restricted maximum likelihood and Gibbs sampling and on response from genetic selection when the true environmental covariance deviates from zero were studied. Data were simulated for two traits (one that culling was based on and a continuous trait) using the following true parameters, on the underlying scale: h 2 = 0.4; r A = 0.5; r E = 0.5, 0.0 or −0.5. The selection on the continuous trait was applied to five subsequent generations where 25 sires and 500 dams produced 1500 offspring per generation. Mass selection was applied in the analysis of the effect on estimation of genetic parameters. Estimated breeding values were used in the study of the effect of genetic selection on response and accuracy. The culling frequency was either 0.5 or 0.8 within each generation. Each of 10 replicates included 7500 records on ‘test‐status’ and 9600 animals in the pedigree file. Results from bivariate analysis showed unbiased estimates of variance components and genetic parameters when true r E = 0.0. For r E = 0.5, variance components (13–19% bias) and especially (50–80%) were underestimated for the continuous trait, while heritability estimates were unbiased. For r E = −0.5, heritability estimates of test‐status were unbiased, while genetic variance and heritability of the continuous trait together with were overestimated (25–50%). The bias was larger for the higher culling frequency. Culling always reduced genetic progress from selection, but the genetic progress was found to be robust to the use of wrong parameter values of the true environmental correlation between test‐status and the continuous trait. Use of a bivariate linear‐linear model reduced bias in genetic evaluations, when data were subject to culling.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1:  Agricultural University of Iceland, Borgarnes, Iceland 2:  Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

Publication date: February 1, 2012

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more