Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Cost-effectiveness of plant and animal biodiversity indicators in tropical forest and agroforest habitats

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)


1. Biodiversity data are needed for conservation and management of tropical habitats, but the high diversity of these ecosystems makes comprehensive surveys prohibitively expensive and indicator taxa reflecting the biodiversity patterns of other taxa are frequently used. Few studies have produced the necessary comprehensive data sets to assess the quality of the indicator groups, however, and only one previous study has considered the monetary costs involved in sampling them.

2. We surveyed four plant groups (herbs, liverworts, trees, lianas) and eight animal groups (ants, canopy and dung beetles, birds, butterflies, bees, wasps and the parasitoids of the latter two) in 15 plots of 50 × 50 m2 each, representing undisturbed rainforest and two types of cacao agroforest in Sulawesi, Indonesia. We calculated three biodiversity measures (α and β diversity; percentage of species indicative of habitat conditions), built simple and multiple regression models among species groups (single groups, combinations of 2–11 groups, averaged relative diversity of all 12 groups), and related these to three measures of survey cost (absolute costs and two approaches correcting for different sampling intensities).

3. Determination coefficients (R2 values) of diversity patterns between single study groups were generally low (<0·25), while the consideration of several study groups increased R2 values to up to 0·8 for combinations of four groups, and to almost 1·0 for combinations of 11 groups. Survey costs varied 10-fold between study groups, but their cost-effectiveness (indicator potential versus monetary cost) varied strongly depending on the biodiversity aspect taken into account (α or β diversity, single or multiple groups, etc.).

4.Synthesis and applications. We found that increasing the number of taxa resulted in best overall biodiversity indication. We thus propose that the most cost-efficient approach to general tropical biodiversity inventories is to increase taxonomic coverage by selecting taxa with the lowest survey costs.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: agroforestry management; alpha diversity; beta diversity; biodiversity indication; conservation biology; conservation priorities; land-use gradients; plant and insect communities; rainforests; survey costs

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Biology, Bogor Agricultural University, Jalan Padjajaran, 16144 Bogor, Indonesia 2: Celebes Bird Club, c/o Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Zoologi, Puslitbang Biologi – LIPI, Jl. Raya Bogor Jakarta Km 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia 3: Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany 4: Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany 5: Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia 6: Department of Animal Biodiversity, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria

Publication date: April 1, 2011

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more