Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Comparison of aerial counts with ground counts for large African herbivores

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Over the past 50 years, aerial counts have been widely used in African wildlife management; however, the accuracy of the resulting estimates has rarely been questioned. The reliability of aerial counts of large African herbivores was examined by comparing the results of a series of systematic aerial sample counts with those from a series of line transect foot counts conducted in the Lupande Game Management Area in Zambia.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Africa; aerial; bias; counts; line transect; population density; sampling; wildlife

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Wildlife Resource Monitoring Unit, Environmental Council of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Publication date: October 1, 2002

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more