Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract Aims: 

To develop a human research ethics committee (HREC) mutual acceptance (MA) model, based on the National Health and Medical Research Council's guidelines. The MA model aims to facilitate aspects of multicentre research and decrease the time taken to finalise the HREC review process. Methods: 

Four HREC (The Alfred Hospital, Austin Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Melbourne Health) agreed to participate in a 13-month pilot project to evaluate the MA model. Evaluation included times from submission to approval and stakeholder surveys. Results: 

Seventeen consecutive studies were submitted to the MA pilot project. Stakeholders agreed that the MA model was efficient and effective and that submission and review processes had improved, with a demonstrable reduction in the levels of duplication. There was a 27% improvement in approval times for multicentre studies. Conclusions: 

Our (MA) model resulted in clear improvements in HREC processes and timelines. Stakeholder acceptance was high. This model provides a framework for a broader program of MA. (Intern Med J 2005; 35: 650–654)
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: ethics; mutual acceptance

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Cancer Trials Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Publication date: November 1, 2005

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more