Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shock: Appropriate or Inappropriate?

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

A 76-year-old female with a single chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted for secondary prevention was referred due to multiple discharges. The device was programmed for ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection at 400 ms, fast VT detection at 280 ms, and ventricular fibrillation detection at 320 ms. Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) during charge was enabled. Interrogation revealed a VT episode with a mean cycle length of 270 ms, which was successfully terminated with ATP during charge. Seconds later, the device delivered a shock. This case illustrates the importance of understanding programming algorithms as part of troubleshooting when facing a scenario of device discharge.

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(2):181–183
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: appropriate shock; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; inappropriate shock

Document Type: Case Report

Affiliations: Division of Cardiology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Publication date: April 1, 2010

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more