Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Scaling up by law? Canadian labour law, the nation‐state and the case of the British Columbia Health Employees Union

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

This paper examines the Canadian Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling in favour of the Health Employees Union (HEU) versus the British Columbia government. Based on international labour law, this ruling recognised collective bargaining as part of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. While recent research in human and labour geography on labour law and the state have emphasised its contingent, topological and site‐based nature I argue: (i) that this case reflects how Canadian unions became deeply embedded in post‐war hegemonic splicings of law and space and the state’s role in the reproduction of the wage‐labour relation and (ii) while the HEU’s struggles and the use of international law contest such splicings, these are still sharply inflected by existing nation‐state legal systems that remain both relatively resilient and ambivalent about labour rights. The HEU case thus reveals that scaling up by law may not protect worker interests if labour is otherwise weak.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Geography, The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1020, USA

Publication date: January 1, 2013

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more