Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

An Implicit Projected Argument in Spanish Impersonal‐ and Passive‐Se Constructions

Buy Article:

$47.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

This article argues for the presence of an implicit projected argument in Spec,Voice in Spanish impersonal‐ and passive‐se constructions. The main empirical support comes from an available inalienable‐possession interpretation of the sole overt DP when it is a body part in both constructions. This interpretation is only possible in the presence of a syntactically present c‐commanding possessor. I argue that the implicit projected external argument serves as the inalienable possessor of the body part. Neither the periphrastic passive nor the anticausative‐se construction in Spanish allows an inalienable‐possession interpretation of the sole overt DP when it is a body part. In these instances, I claim, no implicit argument projects in Spec,Voice. I discuss how the presence of a projected argument in Spec,Voice is responsible for by‐phrase restrictions in impersonal‐ and passive‐se constructions and person restrictions in passive‐se constructions; the lack of a projected implicit argument in Spec,Voice of both the periphrastic passive and the anticausative‐se construction is responsible for the lack of the person restrictions in both, and the lack of by‐phrase restrictions in the periphrastic passive.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 December 2017

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more