Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

The ensemble-averaged impedance cardiogram: An evaluation of scoring methods and interrater reliability

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

The interrater reliability and concurrent validity of two methods of scoring the ensemble-averaged impedance cardiogram were evaluated. Impedance cardiographic and electrocardiographic signals were recorded from 40 undergraduate men and women during a baseline rest period and a vocal mental arithmetic task period. Recordings were scored by four raters using a conventional method, involving ensemble averaging after careful editing of beat-to-beat waveforms, and a streamlined method, involving ensemble averaging without beat-to-beat editing. Intraclass correlations for interrater reliability exceeded .92, whereas intraclass correlations for concurrent validity exceeded .97, indicating excellent agreement between raters and scoring methods for all cardiac measures. The streamlined method was significantly faster than the conventional method. The results indicate that variations in beat-to-beat editing do not constitute a serious source of error in the ensemble-averaged impedance cardiogram and support the interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the two scoring methods.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Concurrent validity; Ensemble averaging; Impedance cardiography; Interrater reliability; Stroke volume; Systolic time intervals

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, USA

Publication date: May 1, 1998

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more