Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval

Buy Article:

$59.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Research in political psychology has shown the importance of motivated reasoning as a prism through which individuals view the political world. From this we develop the hypothesis that, with strong positive beliefs firmly in place, partisan groups ignore or discount information about the performance of political figures they like. We then speculate about how this tendency should manifest itself in presidential approval ratings and test our hypotheses using monthly presidential approval data disaggregated by party identification for the 1955–2005 period. Our results show that partisan groups generally do reward and punish presidents for economic performance, but only those presidents of the opposite party. We also develop a model of presidential approval for self-identified Independents and, finally, a model of the partisan gap, the difference in approval between Democrat and Republican identifiers.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: motivated reasoning; partisan groups; presidential approval

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Stony Brook University 2: Fairleigh Dickinson University

Publication date: December 1, 2007

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more