Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Who Gets What and Why: Determinants of Social Allocations

Buy Article:

$59.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Four experiments were conducted to explore how people allocate social resources between meritorious and needy parties. As predicted, participants with high social dominance orientation (SDO), who prefer hierarchical relationships in society, favored meritorious parties. In contrast, participants with low SDO, who value social equality, favored needy parties. Participants appealed to merit- or need-based ideologies to justify their allocations. Apparently, the notion of fairness denotes merit-based reasoning to people with high SDO, whereas it denotes need-based reasoning for those with low SDO. Among the participants, merit- and need-based ideologies were not simply post hoc rationalizations, but rather mediated the allocation decisions. Implications for the study of ideology and for theories of distributive justice are discussed.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Resource allocation; distributive justice; equity; inequality; social dominance theory

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: University of Connecticut, 2: Stanford University, 3: Harvard University

Publication date: March 1, 1999

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more