Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

JUSTIFYING METAPHYSICAL NIHILISM: A RESPONSE TO CAMERON

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract

Ross Cameron charges the subtraction argument for metaphysical nihilism with equivocation: each premise is plausible only under different interpretations of ‘concrete’. This charge is ungrounded; the argument is both valid and supported by basic modal intuitions.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2009

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more