Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

A Comparison of Methods for Analysing a Nested Frailty Model to Child Survival in Malawi

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Demographic and Health Surveys collect child survival times that are clustered at the family and community levels. It is assumed that each cluster has a specific, unobservable, random frailty that induces an association in the survival times within the cluster. The Cox proportional hazards model, with family and community random frailties acting multiplicatively on the hazard rate, is presented. The estimation of the fixed effect and the association parameters of the modified model is then examined using the Gibbs sampler and the expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm. The methods are compared using child survival data collected in the 1992 Demographic and Health Survey of Malawi. The two methods lead to very similar estimates of fixed effect parameters. However, the estimates of random effect variances from the EM algorithm are smaller than those of the Gibbs sampler. Both estimation methods reveal considerable family variation in the survival of children, and very little variability over the communities.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: EM algorithm; Gibbs sampling; nested frailty; proportional hazards model

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Dept of Statistics, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand. Present address: Dept of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Publication date: March 1, 2001

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more