Monitoring and Managing Cabin Crew Sleep and Fatigue During an Ultra-Long Range Trip
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to monitor cabin crew fatigue, sleep, and performance on an ultra-long range (ULR) trip and to evaluate the appropriateness of applying data collection methods developed for flight crew to cabin crew operations under a fatigue risk management
system (FRMS).
METHODS: Prior to, throughout, and following the ULR trip (outbound flight ULR; mean layover duration = 52.6 h; inbound flight long range), 55 cabin crew (29 women; mean age 36.5 yr; 25 men; mean age 36.6 yr; one missing data) completed a sleep/duty diary and wore an actigraph. Across each flight, crewmembers rated their fatigue (Samn-Perelli Crew Status Check) and sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and completed a 5-min Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) at key times.
RESULTS: Of crewmembers approached, 73% (N = 134) agreed to participate and 41% (N = 55) provided data of suitable quality for analysis. In the 24 h before departure, sleep averaged 7.0 h and 40% took a preflight nap. All crewmembers slept in flight (mean total sleep time = 3.6 h outbound, 2.9 h inbound). Sleepiness and fatigue were lower, and performance better, on the longer outbound flight than on the inbound flight. Post-trip, crewmembers slept more on day 1 (mean = 7.9 h) compared to baseline days, but there was no difference from day 2 onwards.
DISCUSSION: The present study demonstrates that cabin crew fatigue can be managed effectively on a ULR flight and that FRMS data collection is feasible for cabin crew, but operational differences between cabin crew and flight crew need to be considered.
van den Berg MJ, Signal TL, Mulrine HM, Smith AAT, Gander PH, Serfontein W. Monitoring and managing cabin crew sleep and fatigue during an ultra-long range trip. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015; 86(8):705–713.
METHODS: Prior to, throughout, and following the ULR trip (outbound flight ULR; mean layover duration = 52.6 h; inbound flight long range), 55 cabin crew (29 women; mean age 36.5 yr; 25 men; mean age 36.6 yr; one missing data) completed a sleep/duty diary and wore an actigraph. Across each flight, crewmembers rated their fatigue (Samn-Perelli Crew Status Check) and sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and completed a 5-min Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) at key times.
RESULTS: Of crewmembers approached, 73% (N = 134) agreed to participate and 41% (N = 55) provided data of suitable quality for analysis. In the 24 h before departure, sleep averaged 7.0 h and 40% took a preflight nap. All crewmembers slept in flight (mean total sleep time = 3.6 h outbound, 2.9 h inbound). Sleepiness and fatigue were lower, and performance better, on the longer outbound flight than on the inbound flight. Post-trip, crewmembers slept more on day 1 (mean = 7.9 h) compared to baseline days, but there was no difference from day 2 onwards.
DISCUSSION: The present study demonstrates that cabin crew fatigue can be managed effectively on a ULR flight and that FRMS data collection is feasible for cabin crew, but operational differences between cabin crew and flight crew need to be considered.
van den Berg MJ, Signal TL, Mulrine HM, Smith AAT, Gander PH, Serfontein W. Monitoring and managing cabin crew sleep and fatigue during an ultra-long range trip. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015; 86(8):705–713.
Keywords: Fatigue Risk Management System; Karolinska Sleepiness Scale; Psycho-motor Vigilance Test; Samn-Perelli Crew Status Check; actigraphy
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: August 1, 2015
- This journal (formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine), representing the members of the Aerospace Medical Association, is published monthly for those interested in aerospace medicine and human performance. It is devoted to serving and supporting all who explore, travel, work, or live in hazardous environments ranging from beneath the sea to the outermost reaches of space. The original scientific articles in this journal provide the latest available information on investigations into such areas as changes in ambient pressure, motion sickness, increased or decreased gravitational forces, thermal stresses, vision, fatigue, circadian rhythms, psychological stress, artificial environments, predictors of success, health maintenance, human factors engineering, clinical care, and others. This journal also publishes notes on scientific news and technical items of interest to the general reader, and provides teaching material and reviews for health care professionals.
To access volumes 74 through 85, please click here. - Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Submit Articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content