Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity During Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure and Cognitive Stress
BACKGROUND: Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) decreases middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) and can induce hypotension. Mental stress increases MCAv, but the MCAv response to combined LBNP and mental stress (COMBO) is unknown. We hypothesized that performing a stressful
cognitive challenge (i.e., mental stress) concurrently with LBNP would prevent LBNP-induced reductions of MCAv.
METHODS: There were 18 subjects (9 men, 9 women; ages 20.1 ± 0.3 yr) who completed 3 randomized 3-min trials: 1) LBNP (−40 mmHg); 2) mental stress (serial subtraction); and 3) COMBO (LBNP + mental stress). All reported values are mean ± SE. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), forearm blood flow (FBF), and MCAv were measured continuously. Subjects also reported perceived stress following the mental stress and COMBO trials.
RESULTS: LBNP decreased MAP (−1.4 ± 0.5 mmHg), MCAv (−2.6 ± 1.1 cm s−1) and FBF (−0.8 ± 0.1 units), and increased HR (2.7 ± 1.2 bpm). Mental stress increased MAP (10.1 ± 1.3 mmHg), HR (17.4 ± 2.2 bpm), and FBF (2.4 ± 0.4 units), while MCAv (2.8 ± 1.3 cm s−1) tended to increase. COMBO increased MAP (5.3 ± 2.3 mmHg) and HR (21.3 ± 2.6 bpm), and tended to increase FBF (0.5 ± 0.3 units). However, MCAv (-4.6 ± 2.0 cm s−1) decreased during COMBO. Decreases in MCAv during COMBO were not statistically different from LBNP-induced decreases (−4.6 ± 2.0 vs. −2.6 ± 1.1 cm s−1). Subjective ratings of perceived stress (standard 0 to 4 scale) tended to be higher during COMBO than mental stress (2.9 ± 0.1 vs. 2.5 ± 0.1 units).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that mental stress does not effectively preserve MCAv when combined with central hypovolemia (i.e., LBNP).
Durocher JJ, Carter JR, Cooke WH, Young AH, Harwood MH. Cerebral blood flow velocity during combined lower body negative pressure and cognitive stress. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015; 86(8):688692.
METHODS: There were 18 subjects (9 men, 9 women; ages 20.1 ± 0.3 yr) who completed 3 randomized 3-min trials: 1) LBNP (−40 mmHg); 2) mental stress (serial subtraction); and 3) COMBO (LBNP + mental stress). All reported values are mean ± SE. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), forearm blood flow (FBF), and MCAv were measured continuously. Subjects also reported perceived stress following the mental stress and COMBO trials.
RESULTS: LBNP decreased MAP (−1.4 ± 0.5 mmHg), MCAv (−2.6 ± 1.1 cm s−1) and FBF (−0.8 ± 0.1 units), and increased HR (2.7 ± 1.2 bpm). Mental stress increased MAP (10.1 ± 1.3 mmHg), HR (17.4 ± 2.2 bpm), and FBF (2.4 ± 0.4 units), while MCAv (2.8 ± 1.3 cm s−1) tended to increase. COMBO increased MAP (5.3 ± 2.3 mmHg) and HR (21.3 ± 2.6 bpm), and tended to increase FBF (0.5 ± 0.3 units). However, MCAv (-4.6 ± 2.0 cm s−1) decreased during COMBO. Decreases in MCAv during COMBO were not statistically different from LBNP-induced decreases (−4.6 ± 2.0 vs. −2.6 ± 1.1 cm s−1). Subjective ratings of perceived stress (standard 0 to 4 scale) tended to be higher during COMBO than mental stress (2.9 ± 0.1 vs. 2.5 ± 0.1 units).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that mental stress does not effectively preserve MCAv when combined with central hypovolemia (i.e., LBNP).
Durocher JJ, Carter JR, Cooke WH, Young AH, Harwood MH. Cerebral blood flow velocity during combined lower body negative pressure and cognitive stress. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015; 86(8):688692.
Keywords: LBNP; blood pressure; forearm blood flow; heart rate; middle cerebral artery
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 August 2015
- This journal (formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine), representing the members of the Aerospace Medical Association, is published monthly for those interested in aerospace medicine and human performance. It is devoted to serving and supporting all who explore, travel, work, or live in hazardous environments ranging from beneath the sea to the outermost reaches of space. The original scientific articles in this journal provide the latest available information on investigations into such areas as changes in ambient pressure, motion sickness, increased or decreased gravitational forces, thermal stresses, vision, fatigue, circadian rhythms, psychological stress, artificial environments, predictors of success, health maintenance, human factors engineering, clinical care, and others. This journal also publishes notes on scientific news and technical items of interest to the general reader, and provides teaching material and reviews for health care professionals.
To access volumes 74 through 85, please click here. - Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Submit Articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content