Reliability of Precision Data Obtained from Interlaboratory Studies
Precision data, such as laboratory-to-laboratory SD (sL ) and repeatability SD, obtained from interlaboratory tests are needed to assess analytical test methods. These precision data describing random error are subject to random variation. In order to avoid distorted assessments of test methods, interlaboratory tests must fulfill minimal requirements for achieving, e. g., a desired reliability in sL . In 2009, McClure and Lee considered reliability of sL as a characteristic of an interlaboratory study. They developed an approach to approximate that reliability to make it possible to adapt the study design of an interlaboratory study to a desired reliability in sL . The McClure and Lee approach introduces the "margin of relative error" to arrive at the magnitude of the uncertainty in sL . This article discusses their approach and presents a generalized approach. The limitations of McClure and Lee's approximation are shown to result in underestimation of the actual variability of sL due to the disregard of the inherent negative bias of sL . This bias corresponds to the fact that the expected value of the obtained sL lies below the true value σ L one would obtain in an interlaboratory study with an infinite number of laboratories and replicates. In order to achieve the reported level of reliability in sL , the actual number of laboratories required is typically approximately 25% higher than that calculated by McClure and Lee. We present a generalized approach using "margins of relative random error," which takes the impact of the bias of the sL into account, resulting in a more realistic estimation of the variability of the precision parameter sL .
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 March 2013
More about this publication?
- The Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL publishes refereed papers and reviews in the fields of chemical, biological and toxicological analytical chemistry for the purpose of showcasing the most precise, accurate and sensitive methods for analysis of foods, food additives, supplements and contaminants, cosmetics, drugs, toxins, hazardous substances, pesticides, feeds, fertilizers and the environment available at that point in time. The scope of the Journal includes unpublished original research describing new analytical methods, techniques and applications; improved approaches to sampling, both in the field and the laboratory; better methods of preparing samples for analysis; collaborative studies substantiating the performance of a given method; statistical techniques for evaluating data. The Journal will also publish other articles of general interest to its audience, e.g., technical communications; cautionary notes; comments on techniques, apparatus, and reagents.
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Journal Information
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites