Alignment of CTE Centers with the Baldrige Quality Award in Education Criteria: Perceptions of Leaders and Faculty
This study examined career and technical education (CTE) centers in Michigan and their potential alignment with the Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award in Education. CTE center leaders and their faculty were asked to provide their perceptions of how well their organizations meet Baldrige
quality elements, using a version of the Baldrige Assessment Tool. The study further queried CTE center leaders and faculty with regard to quality awards received and their desire to pursue external quality award. Differences between CTE leaders and faculty responses were explored. This research
used an on-line survey to gather perceptions of CTE center leaders and faculty. The data collection tool utilized a six-point Likert scale moving from strong disagreement to strong agreement (6.0). Of the CTE center leaders and faculty, 293 responded; nearly three-fourths were faculty. Frequency,
descriptive, and ANOVA statistics revealed the perception by CTE center leaders and faculty that their organizations were strong enough to win external quality award. Of the 40 Baldrige items on the assessment tool, only four items had less than 50% of participants not indicating moderate
and/or strong agreement. Items ranked from a 5.71 to 4.04 mean. Statistically significant differences between leaders and faculty were identified in four categories.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics
Keywords: ADVANCED ACCREDITATION; BALDRIGE; CRITERIA CATEGORIES; QUALITY AWARD
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 April 2016
- (CTER) publishes refereed articles that examine research and research-related topics in vocational/career and technical education, career development, human resource development, career issues in the schools (Grades K-12), postsecondary education, adult and lifelong learning, and workforce education. The CTER Editorial Board is committed to publishing scholarly work that represents a variety of conceptual and methodological bases. Submission of manuscripts representing one of the following styles is encouraged: (a) empirically-based manuscripts that report results of original research, either quantitative or qualitative, (b) reviews or synthesis of empirical or theoretical literature, (c) essays derived from original historical or philosophical research, (d) reviews of recently published books, and (e) rejoinders to articles recently published in CTER. CTER will consider for publication papers initially presented at conferences, including those disseminated through conference proceedings.
To view issues before 2005, please click here. - Editorial Board
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites