Idaho Secondary Principals Perceptions of CTE Teachers' Professional Development Needs
The purpose of this research was to identify secondary principals’ perceptions of Career and Technical Education (CTE) teacher's professional development needs. A descriptive instrument based on Borich's (1980) Needs Assessment Model was completed by 128 respondents (N = 256).
Items related to teaching in a CTE program were used to rate the importance of specified items in regards to importance and competence of teachers. Mean Weighted Discrepancy Scores (MWDS) were used to prioritize perceived professional development needs. Teaching critical thinking skills and
motivating students were the items with the highest importance ratings. CTE teachers were perceived to be most competent at teaching safety and classroom management. “Motivating Students to Learn” was found to be the highest rated in-service priority as measured by the MWDS. The
findings offer direction for pre-service curriculum and in-service activities for CTE teachers. Input from principals and other stakeholders are a foundation for CTE in-service planning.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics
Keywords: CTE; in-service; needs assessment; professional development; school principals
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 January 2013
- (CTER) publishes refereed articles that examine research and research-related topics in vocational/career and technical education, career development, human resource development, career issues in the schools (Grades K-12), postsecondary education, adult and lifelong learning, and workforce education. The CTER Editorial Board is committed to publishing scholarly work that represents a variety of conceptual and methodological bases. Submission of manuscripts representing one of the following styles is encouraged: (a) empirically-based manuscripts that report results of original research, either quantitative or qualitative, (b) reviews or synthesis of empirical or theoretical literature, (c) essays derived from original historical or philosophical research, (d) reviews of recently published books, and (e) rejoinders to articles recently published in CTER. CTER will consider for publication papers initially presented at conferences, including those disseminated through conference proceedings.
To view issues before 2005, please click here. - Editorial Board
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites