The Effect of Capstone Cooperative Education Experiences, and Related Factors, On Career and Technical Education Secondary Student Summative Assessment Scores
Research has discussed the benefits of cooperative education experiences for secondary career and technical education students. Yet, in this era of high stakes testing and program accountability, the amount of time that students are permitted to participate in cooperative education
has diminished, fearing that time spent out of the classroom would result in lower test scores. Unfortunately, there is little empirical evidence to suggest a relationship between cooperative education and performance on summative assessments. This baseline study of secondary career and technical
education students in Pennsylvania indicated that students who participated in capstone cooperative education experiences scored significantly higher on summative assessments, as measured by NOCTI scores, than those students who did not participate. Additionally, this study determined that
student GPA, IEP status, length of time on co-op or quality of Training Plan could not significantly account for any established mean differences.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics
Keywords: Capstone Programs; Career and Technical Education; Cooperative Education; NOCTI scores; School-to-Work
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 January 2013
- (CTER) publishes refereed articles that examine research and research-related topics in vocational/career and technical education, career development, human resource development, career issues in the schools (Grades K-12), postsecondary education, adult and lifelong learning, and workforce education. The CTER Editorial Board is committed to publishing scholarly work that represents a variety of conceptual and methodological bases. Submission of manuscripts representing one of the following styles is encouraged: (a) empirically-based manuscripts that report results of original research, either quantitative or qualitative, (b) reviews or synthesis of empirical or theoretical literature, (c) essays derived from original historical or philosophical research, (d) reviews of recently published books, and (e) rejoinders to articles recently published in CTER. CTER will consider for publication papers initially presented at conferences, including those disseminated through conference proceedings.
To view issues before 2005, please click here. - Editorial Board
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites