Objectives:The purpose of this investigation was to determine if adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients could benefit from using a speech processing strategy in which the input spectrum was interleaved among electrodes across the two implants.Design:Two separate experiments
were conducted. In both experiments, subjects were tested using a control speech processing strategy and a strategy in which the full input spectrum was filtered so that only the output of half of the filters was audible to one implant, while the output of the alternative filters was audible
to the other implant. The filters were interleaved in a way that created alternate frequency “holes” between the two cochlear implants.Results:In experiment one, four subjects were tested on consonant recognition. Results indicated that one of the four subjects performed
better with the interleaved strategy, one subject received a binaural advantage with the interleaved strategy that they did not receive with the control strategy, and two subjects showed no decrement in performance when using the interleaved strategy. In the second experiment, 11 subjects
were tested on word recognition, sentences in noise, and localization (it should be noted that not all subjects participated in all tests). Results showed that for speech perception testing one subject achieved significantly better scores with the interleaved strategy on all tests, and seven
subjects showed a significant improvement with the interleaved strategy on at least one test. Only one subject showed a decrement in performance on all speech perception tests with the interleaved strategy. Out of nine subjects, one subject preferred the sound quality of the interleaved strategy.
No one performed better on localization with the interleaved strategy.Conclusion:Data from this study indicate that some adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients can benefit from using a speech processing strategy in which the input spectrum is interleaved among electrodes across
the two implants. It is possible that the subjects in this study who showed a significant improvement with the interleaved strategy did so because of less channel interaction; however, this hypothesis was not directly tested.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics
Keywords:
Bilateral;
cochlear implants;
electrodes
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date:
January 1, 2010
More about this publication?
The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is a scholarly peer-reviewed publication and the official journal of the American Academy of Audiology. JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, hearing and balance public health, and hearing and vestibular science. The journal is an online-only publication with a related continuing-education assessment program available to Academy members. Beginning in January 2025, the Academy resumed its role as the publisher of JAAA.
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites