Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T16:05:24.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separating a horse from the social group for riding or training purposes: a descriptive study of human-horse interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

GH Meisfjord Jørgensen ,
KE Fremstad ,
CM Mejdell  and
KE Bøe
GH Meisfjord Jørgensen*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
KE Fremstad
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
CM Mejdell
Affiliation:
Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Department of Health Surveillance, PO Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway
KE Bøe
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: grete.jorgensen@bioforsk.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how difficult it was to halter and separate a horse (Equus caballus) from a group for riding or training purposes and to describe how human-horse interactions could affect this common procedure. A total of 20 different horse groups, with a minimum of five horses in each, were studied on 14 farms in Norway, from June to October 2007. On each farm, information about the facilities, the horse and the handler was recorded. In each group, the horse owner or keeper (handler) was asked to enter the group, approach his/her horse, halter it and lead it out through the gate, then keep the horse standing out of sight from other horses for two minutes. The entire procedure was video recorded and the behaviour of the target horse, handler and other horses was subsequently scored. Only one of the 100 horses moved away from the handler when approached. Ninety-six percent of the target horses followed their handler without showing any resistance. In 75% of the tests, the other horses did not interact with the target horse and/or handler. At the gate, 26% of the handlers did not turn the target horse around before closing the gate, thereby placing themselves in a vulnerable position, with their body in very close proximity to the horse's hind legs. In conclusion, separating a horse from its group can be considered relatively safe and unproblematic, provided good management practices and trained handlers.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourgroup housinghorsehuman-horse interactionsseparating horse
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , May 2011 , pp. 271 - 279
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Zidan, FM and Rao, S 2003 Factors affecting the severity of horse-related injuries. Injury 34: 897–900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachmann, I and Stauffacher, M 2002 Housing and exploitation of horses in Switzerland: a representative analysis of the status quo. Schweizer Archive für Tierheilkunde 144: 331–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitnavis, JP, Gibbons, CLMH, Hirigoyen, M, Parry, JL and Simpson, AHRW 1996 Accidents with horses: what has changed in 20 years? Injury 27: 103–105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, JW, Ladewig, J, Søndergaard, E and Malmkvist, J 2002 Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75: 233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, JW 2006 Fear in horses — responses to novelty and habituation. Licenciate Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Giebel, G, Braun, K and Mittelmeier, W 1993 Horse riding accidents involving children. Chirurg 64: 938–947Google Scholar
Gonyou, HW, Hemsworth, PH and Barnett, JL 1986 Effects of frequent interactions with humans in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorecka, A, Bakuniak, M, Chruszezewski, MH and Jezierski, TA 2007 A note on the habituation to novelty in horses: handler effect. Animal Science Papers and Reports 25: 143–152Google Scholar
Hausberger, M and Muller, C 2002 A brief note on some possible factors involved in the reactions of horses to humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76: 339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausberger, M, Roche, H, Henry, S and Visser, EK 2008 A review of the human-horse relationship. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heleski, CR, Shelle, AC, Nielsen, BD and Zanella, AJ 2002 Influence of housing on weanling horse behaviour and subsequent welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH 2003 Human-animal interactions in livestock productions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jezierski, T, Jaworski, Z and Górecka, A 1999 Effects of handling on behaviour and heart rate in Konik horses: comparison of stable and forest rared youngstock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, E, Farrant, G and Civil, I 2004 Animal-related injury in an urban New Zealand population. Injury 35: 1234–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RB 1994 Regular handling and the domestic chick's fear of human beings: generalisation of response. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, GHM and Bøe, KE 2007 Individual paddocks versus social enclosure for horses. Horse behaviour and welfare, EAAP publication No 122: 79–83Google Scholar
Keeling, LJ, Blomberg, A and Ladewig, J 1999 Horse-riding accidents: When the human-animal relationship goes wrong! In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology pp 86. 17-21 August 1999, Lillehammer, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Lansade, L, Bouissou, MF and Erhard, H 2008 Reactivity to isolation and association with conspecifics: a temperament trait stable across time and situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, NJ and Hurnik, JF 1998 The effect of some common management practices on the ease of handling of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, AS, Martin, JE, Bornett-Gauci, HLI and Wilkinson, RG 2008 Horse personality: variation between breeds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112: 369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luescher, UA, McKeown, DB and Halip, J 1991 Reviewing the causes of obsessive compulsive disorders in horses. Veterinary Medicine 86: 527–530Google Scholar
Mal, ME and McCall, CA 1996 The influence of handling during different ages in a halter training test in foals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50: 115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrory, P, Turner, M, LeMasson, B, Bodere, C and Allemandou, A 2006 An analysis of injuries resulting from professional horse racing in France during 1991-2001: a comparison with injuries resulting from professional horse racing in Great Britain during 1992-2001. British Journal of Sports Medicine 40: 614–618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGreevy, P 2005 Communication. In: Rodenhuis, J (ed) Equine Behaviour: A Guide For Veterinarians And Equine Scientists pp 151–163. Saunders: London, UKGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, PD, Cripps, PJ, French, NP, Green, LE and Nicol, CJ 1995 Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the thoroughbred horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 86–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, DE and Bixbyhammett, D 1992 Equestrian injuries in children and young adults. American Journal of Diseases of Children 146: 611–614Google ScholarPubMed
Petersen, S, Tolle, KH, Blobel, K, Grabner, A and Krieter, J 2006 Evaluation of horse keeping in Schleswig-Holstein. Zuchtungskunde 78: 207–217Google Scholar
Press, JM, Davis, PD, Wiesner, SL, Heinemann, A, Semik, P and Addison, RG 1995 The national jockey injury study: an analysis of injuries to professional horse-racing jockeys. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 5: 236–240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivera, E, Benjamin, S, Nielsen, B, Shelle, J and Zanella, AJ 2002 Behavioural and physiological responses of horses to initial training: the comparison between pastured versus stalled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Søndergaard, E, Clausen, E, Christensen, JW and Schougaard, H 2002 Opstaldning og hold af heste — Danske anbefalinger pp 105. DJF report Husdyrbrug 39. Danish Agricultural Research: Tjele, Denmark. [Title translation: Housing and management of horses - Danish recommendations]Google Scholar
Thomas, KE, Annest, J, Gilchrist, J and Bixby-Hammett, DM 2006 Non-fatal horse related injuries treated in emergency departments in the United States, 2001-2003. British Journal of Sports Medicine 40: 619–626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, M, McCrory, P and Halley, W 2002 Injuries in professional horse racing in Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland during 1992-2000. British Journal of Sports Medicine 36: 403–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vervuert, I and Coenen, M 2002 Feeding and housing management in horses. Pferdeheilkunde 18: 629–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waran, NK and Cuddeford, D 1995 Effects of loading and transport on the heart rate and behaviour of horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar